AI Content Benchmark

Compare 4 AI writing
methods in real-time

Pick a service, click Launch — watch GPT-4.1 web research, GPT-5 Mini,
Gemini 2.5 Flash and Claude Haiku generate live, side by side.

4 Generation Methods
🔍
V1 — Consumer Research
gpt-4.1 web search → gpt-5-mini
4 live web searches for pricing, competitors, reviews and company data — then generates a 2,000+ word guide.
~2min€0.10/article10/10 quality
⚡
V2 — GPT-5 Mini Rewrite
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Rewrites existing AU seo_content with Billoff tone, improved structure and a 13-section plan. 100× cheaper than V1.
~60sec€0.008/article8/10 quality
✨
V3 — Gemini 2.5 Flash
gemini-2.5-flash
Rewrites existing AU content with Google's fast multimodal model. Strong reasoning, excellent HTML structure, highest word count.
~35sec€0.012/article9/10 quality
🤖
V4 — Claude Haiku 4.5
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Rewrites existing AU content with Anthropic Claude. Near-frontier intelligence, precise instruction-following, clean structured prose.
~45sec€0.022/article9/10 quality
Choose a Service
Writing Persona
👤 Loading…
✏️ Customize
No service selected
Initialising…
🔍
V1 — Consumer Research
gpt-4.1 + gpt-5-mini
waiting
Content will appear here…
⚡
V2 — GPT-5 Mini
gpt-5-mini direct
waiting
Content will appear here…
✨
V3 — Gemini Flash
gemini-2.5-flash
waiting
Content will appear here…
🤖
V4 — Claude Haiku
claude-haiku-4-5
waiting
Content will appear here…

Generation Complete

Click any card to read the full article.

Side-by-Side Comparison
Test another service? Run the benchmark again with a different service or method.